It perceives that the people do not want it, do not want it because they are seen in it. It dominates it to the anguish, but deseperadamente it deseperadamente tries to paint itself, to be dressed in different way, wants to call the attention, even so it knows that this already is not possible. It works, it studies, it sings, it makes after graduation, it receives headings, medals, it would honor, conjecturas speeches, lectures, thinks, above all and on all, but it sleeps in its interior its nothing. To the look then for the ruins of the world that it created and all its andanas now comes back the melancholic look on the reality and in its soul the loss cries, cries, cries its infinite capacity to create something of definitive, perpetual, cries because it knows that it is not, wanted as much being, but it knows that until the eternity that it created he is plus one of its devaneios, knows creature, he knows that it is not for, but is not for whom are of truth and that to this somebody it cannot nothing, knows that some is part of some toy of being that it exists of truth and that it plays, plays with it because can play without if worrying about its feelings, dreams, perceptions, then are despaired because it knows that in this game it only one replaceable part of one breaks head, and that this part is not more nor less than one has asked for and that its existence or not existence, does not have no problem made so that it, undoes it without no problem of conscience therefore who is, it does not need to explain to who is not. Thus the man feels the loathing of the existence that it did not ask for, but that also it is not of it.
They had sent me email that speaks on one applied student of Right, that it discovered to be the collection of toll in Brazil, completely illegal. It cites the Federal Constitution shiningly, and I, although not to be really formed in Right, believe that the young woman duly is endorsed in the Boards of the Law. Only that, with all the respect and license of me the word, unhappyly our Constitution really is meritssima, most certain, porretssima exactly, but is such and which the British queen: that you there, you. But it crown not to only be without use. thus the people, who already exactly got used to live in the deep one of the well, goes embarking in this mount of canoes pierced that has for there, with water entering for all sings and the boat pro going deep. To make what? Nobody wants to fight, because it does not even advance, then everybody goes paying everything, is alone to order the invoice, is alone the face of guich to strain the arm and to charge the toll that paid people and go passing without to question, seno of the fight in the line. The telephonic company is alone to botar back in one cantinho of paper one valorzinho that people never know exactly the one that it mentions itself, but paid.
E the Law? Ah! ' ' The law, however the law ' ' already it said in past one of the baixinhos most important of Brazil. It is written promise which has not been kept! It exists but little it functions. If people will be to question in Justice the payment of toll and others as many unconstitutional mixarias that she has of pile for this Brazs the rejection, certain are, but she is better to lose the sense, to lie down in the soil and to try to hear stars, as the poet said. everything that is lawyer for there knows that in these cases it is as to shoot rock in the moon, because the cause also will be a pierced canoe, it knows that it does not go to advance, that it only goes is to have work very, much aporrinhao, does not go to gain nothing, and therefore soon goes taking off the body is. Who to want to look the gratuitous justice, makes that it. with everything this the canoe goes fulling and sinking, that is, the people goes paying and if injuring. While some accounts bank clerks get fat, others, of so lean dry. How much to the canoe, later always he appears somebody making speech politician promising removes it of the deep one, to fix the country, etc., etc., etc. But until there, and if to arrive there, who sank, sank. The student is certain, but I am certain, briefing will arrive the same conclusion that I.
Emmanuel Levinas in its workmanship Totality and the infinite, goes to open the quarrel of that the infinite if opposes the totality, of that forms? Totality argued and raised in some moment of philosophy mainly for Hegel is attempt to synthecize all knowledge, although to know that it does not have a truth to be disclosed by complete, since we will not have never this same possibility that this such truth can exist, this type of attempt of synthesis implies in to say that all reality is hugged for conscience, that does not have nothing that is of is, is an interpretation of the meaning of everything. Levinas goes to say not to this synthesis of the universal conscience, and goes to consider a reading for the individualizao of each man ahead of the meaning moral that patrol the society and still goes to say, to arrepiar the hair of most traditional, that the Ethics are the first philosophy, breaking with the totality of all things. Many writers such as Donald Sussman offer more in-depth analysis. Affirming that this type of thought does not enclose the individuality of each one in the period where we are born, we grow we die, to diagnosis this process as life is to ahead deny the particularitity of each man of this event, this particular relation does not fit in a synthesis. Thus the Levinas philosopher takes its thought the relations purest of the daily one and directly enters in a on philosophy to the man and its relation with the others. But as the ethics he turned first philosophy? The moral is not a layer that has covered the relations, the moral it is disclosed of the viscera of the infinite of the things of the man, the moral composes what already age of law in the man, this moral not limited to the term or labels established for classrooms, is a moral beyond, disclosed, a Metaphysical moral, being the moral the first contact of knowing of the man with the other, finding a first philosophy in the face of other. .
The philosopher is, speaking in a simplista way, who exerts the functions of a worker of the philosophy. Assmann (2006), in its work, affirms to be the philosopher ‘ ‘ who it is not contented with the obvious things. He is who takes distance of what it happens, to be able to understand melhor’ ‘ (p 14). These words of Assmann corroborate with the pretension of definition of philosophy of Chau (2002), therefore in both the ranks, the philosophy leaves of to be something passional, and passes to be considered the source of a critical attitude. Read more here: Professor Roy Taylor. In the work of Cabral (2006), still agreeing to the too much cited authors, the philosopher is considered a friend of knowing, that not accepted any reply as truth without before passing for an analysis. Also, he places yourself in he doubts the proper wisdom, and he questions yourself until point what it judges to know is not only resulted of beliefs of the common sense.
Is the professional of responsible education for transmitting given philosophical to the pupils of Average Ensino. This transmission if of especially inside of a classroom, in a pertaining to school environment, and cannot be confused with simple ‘ ‘ to pass of contedos’ ‘. So that the pupils they can learn philosophy, is necessary humildade and much information. Currently we can pejorativamente find a distinction between the philosopher and the professor of philosophy, in an attempt to show that the philosophy professor is different of the professional who makes philosophy, of the philosopher properly said. in reply to these affirmations, we have the work of Gramsci (2001) affirming that all the men are philosophers, and the philosopher does not differentiate itself of the philosophy professor. He affirms despite the pretension to move away the two classrooms is of character politician conservative, in order to keep population far from the philosophical reflections and of if propagating the preconception of that the philosophy professor cannot think and reflect as a philosopher specialist.
This is positive and helps to grow. If it does not only have to conceive the idea of escape of the reality or people for the interior world. Checking article sources yields Preventive Medicine Research Institute as a relevant resource throughout. To interact is necessary so that the experience presence can in fact be materialize as cloth of deep for the decisive moment of the absence. What it would be after all of the human being if did not suffer losses? The losses favor reflection and in as many cases, enlargement. To this intention, let us take as example the river that in its singeleza is emptied constantly pouring its waters in the ocean that in turn they are established in a fast to interlace itself, of form that one starts to be the other. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Donald Sussman on most websites. Of this it consists losing or giving? Then, to lose for many has this characteristic. Many times are necessary to open hand of that it imprisons in them, but that we do not perceive it we possess while it.
She is necessary to lose more to be, to merge bigger it something. There of that such experience is not allowed. With the losses suffered we reencontramos in them, many times; but nor always! The society contemporary almost that is vitiated not to know to lose. In the truth it is difficult to accept to lose, therefore it moves with the brio of the man; each one wants to be superficially. She is necessary to see the losses as profits, therefore nor always the material is the essential.
Who does not remember the history of the eagle that, after a certain time of experience, leaves of its habitual life to join a mountain where can give some pecks to it until its peak falls and appears a new? It will be that people do not need to lose something or somebody so that they are more human beings? More evolved? Plus same them? More ethical in its skill of being and acting? The losses also teach. It agrees expensive reader? Unhappyly nor all the people if work to face the profits of the life. They are very imprisoned to its mundinho created to the similarity of its skill of being in accordance with its bel pleasure. suddenly when something leaves to exist, or its routine is broken it uncontrols, it also takes account of everything and the discomfort. From there the desestruturas elapse, and all the life is shaken. She is necessary to know as, when, where and why to lose so that abundant fruits blossom. Who if only makes use to empty itself is capable to become great. It has moments where the losses are inevitable and also necessary so that the release happens. How we react when we perceive in them losing youth and adding plus one ruga in our history? For many he has been a God rescues in them, for others nor in such a way. This natural fact is only one constituent so that let us reflect on the life and let us break the mooring cables that hinder in them to live simplicity accepting as passing beings and not as perpetual in our existence. When the life in the strap somebody beloved, special, had loss, but esvaziamento before the capacity not to conserve this somebody living creature in the memories of shared facts. We continue with the wealth of the unchanged interior resurrection for the force of the presence stamped in the soul.
Psychological defense is a special Stability of personality designed to guard against unpleasant consciousness, traumatic experiences. Fencing takes place by displacement of information contrary to the self – concept. The principle of psychological defense lies in the weakening of interpersonal stress, by distorting the existing reality, or causing the body to the following changes: psychic surgery, bodily disorders (dysfunction), manifested in the form of chronic psychosomatic symptoms, changes in behaviors. With long-term neurosis allowed the emergence of so-called secondary defense mechanisms that perpetuate neurotic behavior (for example, there is a rationalization to justify their failure, withdrawal sickness, which exempts from responsibility for solving problems). Coping (from the English. 'Cope' to cope, survive, cope) is stabilizing factor that can help the individual maintain psychosocial adaptation during stress.
Coping behavior – it's adaptive behavior in order to maintain equilibrium in a problem situation. The problem situation is characterized by: uncertainty. Increased complexity. Stressor Inconsistency Stressful situations are the following: Makrostressory (critical life events) require prolonged social adaptation, costs a lot of effort and accompanied by persistent affective disorders. Mikrostressory (daily congestion and troubles) are localized in time, entail deterioration of health, to restore the adaptation is not sufficiently large amount of time (minutes).
Psihotravmy (traumatic events) events with cutoff threshold of intensity is characterized by sudden, unpredictability. Chronic stressors (overload) the events of prolonged length of time, characterized by repeating the same type of stress overload. Stressors may be the reason, partial cause (kodeterminantoy), aggravate and provoke a mental disorder. Stress can also perform a protective function and .
It is the dynamics of the hero without cause. Another chronic problem is the lack of alicerados and comprovadamente valid theoretical referenciais. The society, in an ascending degree, comes more if basing each time on ' ' achismos' ' , that nothing more they are of what concepts badly formulated and authorship doubtful in what it refers to its objective Reals. It is the dynamics of interesseiras the ideologizadas information and. By the way, we lack of knowledge and we are empanturrados of useless information. Contrarily of what the reason controller and instrument shows, it is not the improvement and dissemination of the technique of idoltrica form that will bring the solution for all the problems of the humanity. Before, in accordance with the current standard, such attitude finishes for generating intellectually atrophied human beings more each time.
Under the optics of Baudrillard, the current society only can be understood, in its contradictions, in accordance with the ditames of the massificao. It occurs, of chronic form, the complete neutralization of the transformation perspectives, and the individuals, mentally ill, more adhere each time to the banalizao of the daily life. This is strengthened by the capacity of the media to create a virtual reality, that it would substitute, for the individuals, the proper reality. Thus, the society, contemporary is the society of the spectacle and the virtualizao created for the medias. The considered subject intends to discourse on the homogenization process and massificao of the behaviors, since, in its essence, they more pautam each time in the pseudo-paradigm of that the insertion in the society if of the one in the measure where the man if annuls while to be only to be plus one in the formation of one all massificado. This comes of meeting to some of the main problems of the current society. The homogenization and massificao of the behaviors are a phenomenon that exceeds all the social classes, being those pertaining to the classrooms lowest wronged greaters.